It was once common practice to restrict individuals with diabetes from certain jobs or classes of employment solely because of the diagnosis of diabetes or the use of insulin, without regard to an individual’s abilities or circumstances.
Employment decisions should not be based on generalizations or stereotypes regarding the effects of diabetes. The impact of diabetes and its management varies widely among individuals.
Questions are sometimes raised by employers about the safety and effectiveness of individuals with diabetes in a given job.
When such questions are legitimately raised, a person with diabetes should be individually assessed to determine whether or not that person can safely and effectively perform the particular duties of the job in question.
Application of blanket policies to individuals with diabetes results in people with diabetes being denied employment for which they are well qualified and fully capable of performing effectively and safely.
The word “diabetes” can lead employers to concerns about reliability and productivity, thereby influencing their willingness to hire, continue to employ or promote an individual living with diabetes.
Also, coworkers who lack information about diabetes can feel uncertain about how to treat their colleagues with diabetes who are testing their blood glucose, administering insulin and treating hypoglycemia throughout the workday.
Therefore, it is not uncommon for people living with diabetes to conceal their disease from their employers and colleagues in order to avoid negative reactions or discrimination.
As a result, an insulin injection may be missed, a blood glucose test forgotten or a meal postponed, consequently jeopardizing an individual’s overall health and perhaps his or her safety on the job.
An individual with well managed diabetes, and whose employer encourages his or her diabetes management in the workplace, does not pose any more threat to his or her colleagues or to the efficient operation of a business.
It is important that everyone in the workplace has accurate information about diabetes and how it is managed.
Communication, cooperation and accurate information will encourage a healthier and more productive environment.
EVAULATING SAFETY RISK OF EMPLOYEES WITH DIABETES
Employers who deny job opportunities because they perceive all people with diabetes to be a safety risk do so based on misconceptions, misinformation, or a lack of current information about diabetes.
The following guidelines provides information for evaluating an individual with diabetes who works or seeks to work in what may be considered a safety-sensitive position.
The first step in evaluating safety concerns is to determine whether the concerns are reasonable in light of the job duties the individual must perform.
For most types of employment (such as jobs in an office, retail, or food service environment) there is no reason to believe that the individual’s diabetes will put employees or the public at risk.
At the moment there is a protest going on outside Meat Factories because farmers are not happy with how much they are getting for their cattle per head!
This means that they are refusing to sell their livestock to the meat factories which may be a good thing for consumers as people today are eating too much meat and they should be eating more vegetables and fruit!
The unfortunate thing is that some people who work in meat factories might lose their jobs!
I think that we should all stop eating meat and eat plenty of fruit,vegetables and fish!
What do you think?
I know people are concerned about their jobs in the meat factories,one of my neighbours Correl works in the meat factory in Mooncoin and I would not like to see him out of a job!
However if more people were eating fruit ,vegetables and fish there would be more jobs in this area!
See below photos of the Meat Factory in Mooncoin,it produces pork and bacon.
This is the front of the Meat Factory in Mooncoin.
This is the back of the Mooncoin Meat Factory.
When I visited the Mooncoin meat factory I did not like the awful smell at the entrance of the factory!
It must be really hard for people working there as the smell turned my stomach!
I use to eat pork and bacon but now I dont and after visiting Mooncoin Meat factory yesterday I will never touch pork or bacon again!
When I was a child my mother Mary made bacon and cabbage for our dinner once a fortnight and we got one pork chop each and my father got two pork chops a week!
My parents did not realise how bad meat is for everyone neither did I until I started researching healthy meal options for this site,also when I started to study the Bible I read that in the Old Testament God was against people eating a lot of meat especially meat from pigs as they are scavengers!
See below an infographic of the meats God wants us to avoid!
I started the Daniel Diet after reading this information and I have avoided meat ever since!
I also think that the Adam Diet also explains very well that God thinks that people should be eating fruit and vegetables and not meat!
I think God wants us to eat plenty of fruit, vegetables and fish and to avoid meat altogether!
I think that God wants us to have animals as pets,companions and a means of producing dairy products such as eggs,butter,cheese and milk!
Animals are for friendship and love not for food!
I think this is all true but maybe I am wrong,I would love to know what you all think?
Please leave a comment in the section below!
Our friend Correl gave us a present of a lovely trout from the banks of the River Suir!
Maybe he would prefer to be working in the fishing industry instead of working in a meat factory,I am not sure I must ask him!
Many people think if we all gave up eating meat and stopped slaughtering animals where would we put all the animals?
Firstly we could put a lot of them in the empty fields around the countryside as I see a lot of fields without any cattle in them!
See below a picture of an empty hayfield that plenty of cattle could graze in!
We should also stop all this artificial insemnation and secregate the bulls from the cows!
Then there would be no need to slaughter animals!
Also all these puppy farms that is ridiculous why dont we just leave animals mate naturally!
Well that’s what I think what do you think?
In other types of employment (such as jobs where the individual must carry a firearm,work with chemicals or operate dangerous machinery) the safety concern is whether the employee will become suddenly disoriented or incapacitated.
Such episodes, which are usually due to severely low blood glucose (hypoglycemia), occur only in people receiving certain treatments such as insulin or sulfonylureas and even then can occur infrequently depending on the individual.
Workplace accommodations can be made that are effective in helping the individual to manage his or her diabetes on the job and avoid severe hypoglycemia.
What Should I Do If Someone Experiences Hypoglycemia Attack At Work?
In contrast to hypoglycemia, high blood glucose levels (hyperglycemia) can cause long-term complications over years or decades but does not normally lead to any adverse effect on job performance.
The symptoms of hyperglycemia generally develop over hours or days and do not occur suddenly. Therefore, hyperglycemia does not pose an immediate risk of sudden incapacitation.
While over years or decades, high blood glucose may cause long-term complications to the nerves (neuropathy), eyes (retinopathy), kidneys (nephropathy), or heart, not all individuals with diabetes develop these long-term complications.
Such complications become relevant in employment decisions only when they are established and interfere with the performance of the actual job being considered.
Evaluations should not be based on speculation as to what might occur in the future.
Job evaluations should take high blood glucose levels into account only if they have already caused long-term complications such as visual impairment that interfere with performance of the specific job.
Prevention of hyperglycemia for people with a diabetes is a matter of good self-monitoring and management of blood glucose levels.
What Should I Do If Someone Experiences Diabetic Ketoacidosis At Work?
ACCOMMODATING EMPLOYEES WITH DIABETES
Wellness Gift Ideas for Employees – Buy Two Get One Free – For a limited time, buy set of two Medicomat-6 devices, get a third at no additional charge – Diabetes Foot and Body Health Management Device Medicomat-6
Individuals with diabetes may need certain changes or accommodations on the job in order to perform their work responsibilities effectively and safely.
Employment laws require the provision of “reasonable accommodations” to help an employee with diabetes to perform the essential functions of the job .
Although there are some typical accommodations that many people with diabetes use, the need for accommodations must be assessed on an individualized basis .
May an employer ask a job applicant whether she has or had diabetes or about her treatment related to diabetes before making a job offer?
No. An employer may not ask questions about an applicant’s medical condition or require an applicant to have a medical examination before it makes a conditional job offer. This means that an employer cannot legally ask an applicant questions such as:
whether she has diabetes or has been diagnosed with diabetes (for example, gestational diabetes) in the past;
whether she uses insulin or other prescription drugs or has ever done so in the past; or,
whether she ever has taken leave for medical treatment, or how much sick leave she has taken in the past year.
Of course, an employer may ask questions pertaining to the qualifications for, or performance of, the job, such as:
whether the applicant has a commercial driver’s license; or
whether she can work rotating shifts.
What may an employer do when it learns that an applicant has or had diabetes after she has been offered a job but before she starts working?
When an applicant discloses after receiving a conditional job offer that she has diabetes, an employer may ask the applicant additional questions such as how long she has had diabetes; whether she uses insulin or oral medication; whether and how often she experiences hypoglycemic episodes; and/or whether she will need assistance if her blood sugar level drops while at work.
The employer also may send the applicant for a follow-up medical examination or ask her to submit documentation from her doctor answering questions specifically designed to assess her ability to perform the job’s functions safely.
Permissible follow-up questions at this stage differ from those at the pre-offer stage when an employer only may ask an applicant who voluntarily discloses a disability whether she needs an accommodation to perform the job and what type.
An employer may not withdraw an offer from an applicant with diabetes if the applicant is able to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without reasonable accommodation, without posing a direct threat (that is, a significant risk of substantial harm) to the health or safety of himself/herself or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced through reasonable accommodation.
Are there any instances when an employer may ask an employee with diabetes about his/her condition?
Yes. An employer also may ask an employee about diabetes when it has a reasonable belief that the employee will be unable to safely perform the essential functions of his job because of diabetes. In addition, an employer may ask an employee about his diabetes to the extent the information is necessary:
To support the employee’s request for a reasonable accommodation needed because of his/her diabetes.
To verify the employee’s use of sick leave related to his/her diabetes if the employer requires all employees to submit a doctor’s note to justify their use of sick leave.
To enable the employee to participate in a voluntary wellness program.
Keeping Medical Information Confidential
With limited exceptions, an employer must keep confidential any medical information it learns about an applicant or employee. Under the following circumstances, however, an employer may disclose that an employee has diabetes:
To supervisors and managers in order to provide a reasonable accommodation or to meet an employee’s work restrictions.
To first aid and safety personnel if an employee may need emergency treatment or require some other assistance because, for example, her blood sugar level is too low.
Where needed for workers’ compensation or insurance purposes (for example, to process a claim)
May an employer tell employees who ask why their co-worker is allowed to do something that generally is not permitted (such as eat at his/her desk or take more breaks) that he/she is receiving a reasonable accommodation?
No. Telling co-workers that an employee is receiving a reasonable accommodation amounts to a disclosure that the employee has a disability.
Rather than disclosing that the employee is receiving a reasonable accommodation, the employer should focus on the importance of maintaining the privacy of all employees and emphasize that its policy is to refrain from discussing the work situation of any employee with co-workers.
Employers may be able to avoid many of these kinds of questions by training all employees on the requirements of equal employment opportunity laws.
Additionally, an employer will benefit from providing information about reasonable accommodations to all of its employees.
This can be done in a number of ways, such as through written reasonable accommodation procedures, employee handbooks, staff meetings, and periodic training.
This kind of proactive approach may lead to fewer questions from employees who misperceive co-worker accommodations as “special treatment.”
If an employee experiences an insulin reaction at work, may an employer explain to other employees or managers that the employee has diabetes?
No. Although the employee’s co-workers and others in the workplace who witness the reaction naturally may be concerned, an employer may not reveal that the employee has diabetes.
Rather, the employer should assure everyone present that the situation is under control.
An employee, however, may voluntarily choose to tell her co-workers that she has diabetes and provide them with helpful information, such as how to recognize when her blood sugar may be low, what to do if she faints or seems shaky or confused (for example, offer sweets or a sugary drink), or where to find her glucose monitoring kit.
However, even when an employee voluntarily discloses that she has diabetes, the employer must keep this information confidential.
An employer also may not explain to other employees why an employee with diabetes has been absent from work if the absence is related to her diabetes or another disability.
What kinds of discrimination have people with diabetes reported in the workplace?
Diabetes limits the endocrine system. This is the system that regulates insulin and blood glucose(sugar).In a properly functioning circulatory system, blood carries glucose to all the cells in the body in order to produce energy, while the pancreas produces insulin to help the body absorb excess glucose.
High levels of glucose in the blood are an indication that the body is not producing enough insulin, or that the insulin produced is not working as it should to help the body absorb glucose, indicating a Diabetic or pre-Diabetic condition.
Since 2009, amendments and regulations make clear that diabetes is a disability since it substantially limits the function of the endocrine system because the pancreas no longer works. This internal limitation is enough—no outside limitation is necessary. This means diabetes can be an “invisible” disability.
Direct and indirect discrimination under the Anti-Discrimination Act.
Direct discrimination is when someone is treated less favourably because of their diabetes.
Examples of direct discrimination include if an employer:
1. Refuses to employ you after an employment medical identifies diabetes, or fires you.
2. Limits your job responsibilities.
3.Refuses promotions and training.
Indirect discrimination occurs when a workplace has requirements or practices that may appear fair but in fact discriminate against people on the basis of a particular characteristic.
Examples of indirect discrimination include if an employer is unwilling to:
1. Accommodate your need for regular meal or snack breaks.
2. Provide a private location where you can check blood glucose levels.
3.Provide a private location where you can administer insulin.
4.Allow Installation of emergency ‘hypo’ prevention and treatment provisions at your work station .
Often, discrimination in the workplace occurs because employers and co-workers do not understand diabetes and how it is managed.
Individuals with diabetes can and do serve as highly productive members of the workforce.
The therapies for, and effects of, diabetes vary greatly from person to person, so employers must consider each person’s capacities and needs on an individual basis.
People with diabetes should always be evaluated individually with the assistance of experienced diabetes health care professionals.
The requirements of the specific job and the individual’s ability to perform that job, with or without reasonable accommodations, always need to be considered.
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org or leave your comments below.